Someone opens a PDF invoice and types it into the accounting system. Again.
Four minutes each. Three hundred a month. And the one you paid twice last quarter is still the expensive part.
Home › Inside the build
Three of ours, opened up — every step, every check, and the point where each one stops and asks a person, generated from the workflow files themselves. Then three walkthroughs of how they behave when something is wrong.
50 steps 55 connections 6 stages
48 steps 53 connections 7 stages
16 steps 15 connections 3 stages
Step and connection counts are read straight out of the workflow files. Positions are ours — n8n draws these across seven thousand pixels of canvas, so the steps are re-placed into their stages to be readable. Same steps, same connections. Configuration, credentials and endpoints are never published.
Four minutes each. Three hundred a month. And the one you paid twice last quarter is still the expensive part.
By then a competitor has replied, quoted, and booked the call.
That is the normal reason. It is not a failure of discipline.
Neither workflow below removes a person from the decision. Both remove the typing, the checking and the waiting, and stop at the point where judgment actually matters.
Pick either invoice and step through what happens. The second has a total that does not match its own line items — the sort of thing found three weeks later, if at all.
Draft bill ready
Approvewaiting on a person
Nothing reaches the accounting system until you tap Approve.
Needs a human
Not offered for approval.
No approve button. There is nothing here a person should approve blind.
Sample data — illustration, not a live system
The same pattern applied to inbound leads. The score comes from a rules table you edit in a spreadsheet, not from the model’s opinion.
Hot lead — 100/100
Your rep gets the score, three reasons, and a Claim button, not just another notification.
Cold lead — 20/100
Nobody on your team spends a minute on this one. It is still answered.
Sample data — illustration, not a live system
Four messages, one evening, one inbox. Watch them sorted, then step through any one of them. The two it refuses to answer are the reason this is worth having — anyone can show you the one that went well.
Hi — can we push Thursday’s review to next week? Same time works.
BookedMoved to Tuesday 10:00am. Confirmed with her, partner told.
what do I need to bring to the first meeting?
AnsweredAnswered from your own intake checklist, with a link to it.
What would you charge for a matter like this, and could you start Monday?
Held for youAsks a price and a start date. Acknowledged, reply drafted, nothing sent.
hi is it still on?
Asked, not guessedThree meetings could match. Asked which one rather than picking.
4 messages. 2 handled without you. 2 waiting — each with the reason it stopped.
Sample data — illustration, not a live system
What it checked, message by message
Moved and confirmed
Moving a meeting commits no money and no scope, which is why it is on the allowed list. You decide what goes on that list, and you can take this off it.
Answered from your own checklist
It quotes you rather than improvising. When the checklist is wrong the answer is wrong in exactly one place, and you fix it there once.
Held — a person has to answer this
Approvewaiting on a person
This is the part worth paying for. Software that quotes a price on your behalf is software that can commit you to a number you would never have agreed to.
Asked instead of guessing
No answer given.
A confident wrong answer to a real client costs more than a slow one. This behaviour is the product.
Sample data — illustration, not a live system
Same skeleton every time. Something arrives, rules you control decide, and a person approves anything that moves money or reaches a customer.
Invoices, receipts, statements and forms read into your accounting or matter system as drafts. Arithmetic and duplicates checked in code before anyone looks.
Every inbound lead enriched, scored against your rules, filed in your CRM, and answered, including at 9pm on a Friday.
Document collection, conflict checks, file naming, folder creation and welcome sequences chained behind one approval.
Recurring reports built from your spreadsheets and platforms, formatted to your template, written in your tone, reviewed before they ship.
Inbound mail classified into review, action or archive with extracted next steps. Sensitive matters escalate to a human, never auto-replied.
Contracts checked against your playbook, deviations flagged and summarised. Your deal team still reviews, after the four hours of reading is gone.
Not as a setting that can be switched off by accident, but as how the workflow is built. Where the model and the arithmetic disagree, the arithmetic wins and the document goes to a human. An approval left unanswered is treated as a refusal, never as consent.
The model reads and drafts. Scores, totals, eligibility and identity are ordinary code you can read, and rules you can edit in a spreadsheet without calling us.
You do not need to know how. Tell us what happens today — which apps, and what somebody is retyping — and we will work out the rest.